A strong earthquake north-west of Anchorage on Thanksgiving morning has prompted fresh attention from insurers and emergency agencies, with the U.S. Geological Survey warning that damaging aftershocks remain a distinct possibility in the days ahead.
The magnitude-6.0 event struck shortly after 8am local time near Susitna, about 37 miles from Alaska’s largest city. While authorities reported no major damage or casualties, tremors were widely felt across the state, including in Fairbanks almost 350 miles away. The quake’s depth, measured at roughly 43 miles, helped extend the shaking far beyond Anchorage, state seismologist Mike West told the Anchorage Daily News.
The National Tsunami Warning Center confirmed that “a tsunami is not expected following the quake”. Alaska’s Department of Transportation said roadways, tunnels and key transport infrastructure would be inspected as a precaution, consistent with established protocols following moderate seismic events.
USGS modelling indicates a 28 per cent chance of “one or more aftershocks that are larger than magnitude 5” within the coming week, noting that such events “could be damaging”. Smaller tremors are far more likely, with the agency reporting a 97 per cent probability of aftershocks of magnitude 3 or greater.
The epicentre was recorded 26 miles southwest of Willow at a depth of 42.8 miles, according to reviewed USGS data. Locations within 30 to 50 miles—including Skwentna, Elmendorf Air Force Base, Fort Richardson and several communities around the Cook Inlet—experienced varying degrees of shaking.
For insurers active in the region, the quake serves as a reminder of the unusually complex seismic environment in southern Alaska. The area sits at the intersection of several tectonic systems capable of generating both intermediate-depth and shallower crustal earthquakes. These include the megathrust boundary responsible for the 1964 magnitude-9.2 Alaska earthquake, as well as active faults in the Cook Inlet basin and Castle Mountain Fault.
While Thursday’s tremor did not trigger the widespread losses associated with past events, its location in a heavily populated corridor highlights the ongoing exposure profile for underwriters. The 2018 Anchorage earthquake remains the most costly seismic event in recent years, generating municipal damage estimates in the tens of millions, alongside significant disruption to schools, utilities and transport. At the time, officials recorded non-structural and structural impacts across Anchorage, Eagle River and surrounding areas, including broken waterlines, damaged public buildings and extensive road repair needs.
A consistent challenge for the market has been Alaska’s persistently low level of earthquake insurance uptake. State assessments suggest that only a minority of homeowners carry cover, largely due to high premiums and deductibles. Without a state-run facility equivalent to California’s Earthquake Authority, cover is optional and purchased through private insurers, leaving many households reliant on federal aid when larger events strike.
Historically, insured losses from regional earthquakes have tended to be modest except where shaking coincides with dense populations or critical facilities. Offshore and remote earthquakes—including major events in the Aleutian Islands, the Alaska Peninsula and the Gulf of Alaska—have produced negligible insured losses because damage on land was limited or non-existent.
Even so, Alaska remains one of the world’s most seismically active territories, experiencing tens of thousands of earthquakes each year. For insurance managers, the frequency of seismic activity continues to complicate catastrophe modelling, claims planning and customer communication, particularly given low penetration and the potential for cascading aftershocks.
Thursday’s quake is the most significant recorded in south-central Alaska since a 6.1-magnitude event near Chickaloon in 2021. While early assessments indicate minimal direct economic impact, insurers will be monitoring aftershock activity closely, especially given USGS guidance that the probability of stronger follow-on events remains materially elevated.
With agencies still completing inspections and policyholders reporting their experiences through “Did You Feel It?” surveys, underwriters are likely to revisit their regional exposure and preparedness for the winter season, when response times and repair capacity can be further strained by weather.
As of Thursday evening, no major disruptions had been reported in Anchorage or neighbouring communities, but authorities emphasised that assessments were continuing.
Comments
Post a Comment